Shown below is a plan-form common in the Kawachi (河内) district (in what is now О̄saka Prefecture) of the Yamato region of western Japan. The plan is classified as a ‘longitudinal division’ or yoko-bunwari (横分割) layout. Confusingly, it also falls under the sub-classifications jūretsu-gata (縦列型, lit. ‘transverse line-up type’) or tate-narabi (竪ならび or 竪並び, lit. ‘transverse line-up’); these sub-classifications are redundant in the case of two-room minka and add no information to the yoko-bunwari classification, but will become significant when we get around to considering minka with three or more rooms.
At this point a digression into plan-form naming conventions might be in order (refer to table below for the schematic representation). The seeming contradiction of a plan being described as both ‘longitudinal’ (yoko 横) and ‘transverse’ (tate 縦 or 竪) can be explained by the fact that, while the direction of the divisions (the walls) is longitudinal (yoko), the resultant ‘ganging’ or ‘stacking’ of the rooms is in the transverse direction (tate), just as if you stack some blocks into a tower, the lines between the blocks are horizontal (yoko), but the tower itself is vertical (tate).
Conversely, the other main classification of minka plan-forms, ‘transverse division’ or tate-bunwari (竪分割), has its own sub-classifications: heiretsu-gata (併列型 or 並列型), lit. ‘parallel/horizontal line-up type’; hei 併 can be considered equivalent in meaning to yoko, i.e. ‘longitudinal’) and yoko-narabi (横ならび or 横並び, lit. ‘longitudinal line-up’). In this case, while the direction of the divisions (the walls) is transverse (tate), the resultant ‘ganging’ or ‘stacking’ of the rooms is in the longitudinal direction (yoko), just as the lines between the books on a bookshelf are vertical (tate), but the line of books itself is horizontal (yoko). Again these sub-classifications are redundant in the case of two-room minka and add no information to the tate-bunwari classification until we get to discussing three-room minka.
At any rate, the plan features a large doma, here called a niwa (にわ) with an enclosure near the entrance called the shimo-mise (しもみせ) or shimo-beya (しもべや) for the storage of agricultural implements; in other regions there would normally be a stable (umaya 廐) in this position. At the rear of the doma is the kama-ya (釜屋), the cooking area containing the stove (kama 釜). In front of the kama-ya is a bulkhead (tare-kabe 垂れ壁, lit. ‘hanging wall’) whose purpose is to prevent smoke from the stove from spreading to the habitable rooms of the house. The front part of the timber-floored (yuka-za 床座) area is occupied by the public-facing (omote-muki 表向き) room called the oku (おく), equivalent of the zashiki (座敷); at the rear is the oie (おいえ), corresponding to a ‘family/dining’ room. At the boundary of the niwa and the raised floor rooms is a kind of ochi-en (落ち縁, lit. ‘dropped edge’), a board-floored area lower than the raised floor rooms but higher than the niwa. Here the ochi-en is called a hamayuka (浜床, lit. ‘shore floor’) or hiroshiki (広敷, lit. ‘wide spread’). In older minka, instead of a fixed ochi-en there might have been a moveable oki-yuka-tsukue (置床几, lit. ‘put floor table’). There are closets (oshi-ire 押入) in the two rooms, but no decorative alcove (tokonoma 床の間) or Buddhist altar (butsudan 仏壇).
The five plan diagrams below the main floor plan present the simplest path of evolution of this plan-form. The one-room dwelling is the departure point; first the perimeter area under the eaves is infilled and the dwelling expands into a two-room dwelling; the plan develops into a front-zashiki layout (mae-zashiki-gata 前座敷型) and then into a regular four-room layout (seikei yon-madori 整形4間取り). A board ‘verandah’ (nure-en 濡れ縁) is added at the front of the zashiki, making the space more open and formal in character. The two-room ‘longitudinal division’ (yoko-bunwari 横分割) minka characteristic of this region does not evolve into a regular four-room layout (seikei yon-madori 整形4間取り) via a three-room hiroma-gata san-madori (広間型3間取り) stage, as is the case with the ‘transverse division’ (tate-bunwari 竪分割) plan-form, but rather via an intermediate three-room front-zashiki (mae-zashiki-gata san-madori 前座敷型3間取り) stage.
The plans below are another example of a two-room ‘transverse line-up’ (jūretsu ni-madori 縦列2間取り) minka evolving over a series of incremental expansions into a regular four-room layout (seikei yon-madori 整形4間取り) with a large and complex doma (どま).